-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 608
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update atproto source license to MIT/Apache2 #1788
Conversation
External contributors all signed-off on this, so ready for review and merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM — we could add a changeset so this publishes to npm too!
CC @dholms just wanna confirm that we can publish all these and there's nothing in-flight that we don't want to release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 👍
I'm game to publish & I don't think anythign should be holding it up 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💎
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
* update LICENSE files to MIT/Apache2 * README: update top-level license * update package-level READMEs with license * changeset: license update
Had consensus on this from discussion a week or two back. Copied the license files and general structure from did-method-plc (which we updated months ago), with very minor grammar updates and link fixes.
Notified external contributors and getting sign-offs in this issue thread: #1786
Will give that a couple days before merging (unless 💯 reply sooner).